the senatrice Pagano (DS) it declares that the immission
in role of the teachers of religion “it has evident
financial implications and it doesn’t allow a treatment
that puts aside from a serious quantify of the burdens"

We
specify that: 

the
immission in role of the teachers of religion, that
is the recognition of the juridical state
in how much workers of the school to full title as
all the other teachers, don’t have neither
evident neither future neither hidden financial implications,
rather 

immediately a first year it allows a saving of around
105 billion, and in the arc of the five years a general
saving of well 200 billion. 

In a meeting with the sen. Pagano, the representatives
of the Snadir have specified and documented these
affirmations of ours. Therefore today cannot make
these affirmations (also because up to when the Errand
I balance not ‘makes the calculations, the senatrice
is not able to affirm “evident financial implications!"

for this the senatrice Pagan proposes to postpone
the reunion of the Commission to March 28 and therefore
to take back the iter of the sketch of law to the
light of the to seem that the Errand I balance you/he/she
will have soon to elaborate.

The
neighbor dates some Commission is 28: within a 15
day time frame the Commission balance should calculate
the “evident financial implications”? Certain if it
didn’t do it (as it will be able in so little time!)
it would be an obvious motive to postpone it sticks
discussion, does to postpone anchor it.

 The
senator Occhipinti has been named Sottosegretario
of State to the Office of the Transports and the Navigation.
Therefore it is not the chairman of the sketch of
law anymore on the juridical state of the teachers
of religion in the VII Commission. 

He has been replaced with the senator Pappalardo (DS)

questions: 

who has named him?

Why has not the senator Occhipinti been replaced
with a senator of his same parliamentary group?
Because the logic of the transparency, of the equal
opportunities, of the clear and loyal politics,
it would politically require a homogeneous substitution,
that is with a senator of the same parliamentary
group.

The substitution of the sen. Occhipinti with the
diessino Pappalardo has made to unbalance the commissione
on the slope of the DS (12 against 11)! As it is
possible to notice from how much it follows:

directed
toward the yes

decidedly
for the no

Asciutti
Franco (Forza Italia)

Biscardi
Luigi (DS)

Bevilacqua
Francesco (AN)

Bergonzi
Piergiorgio (Comunista)

BO
Carlo (PPI)

Bruno
Ganeri Antonella (DS)

Brignone
Guido (Lega Forza N Padania)

Cortiana
Fiorello (Verdi)

Corsi
Zeffirelli (Forza Italia)

Donise
Eugenio (DS)

Marri
Italo (AN)

Lombardi
Satriani Luigi (DS)

Monticone
Alberto (PPI)

Lorenzi
Luciano (A.P.E. Autonomisti per l’Europa)

Nava
Davide (Udeur)

Manieri
Maria Rosaria (SDI)

Pace
Lodovico (AN)

Masullo
Aldo (DS)

Ronconi
Maurizio (CCD)

Mele
Giorgio (DS)

Toniolli
Marco (Forza Italia)

Pagano
Maria Grazia (DS)

Pappalardo
Ferdinando (DS)

11

12

Instead
The preceding composition of the VII Commission had
succeeded July 28 th 1999 with a transversal majority
in approving the sketch of law Occhipinti which I
make a will of discussion. Then the Democrats of Left,
that voted against, they were put in puts minority.